Sweatshop mentality - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei CGI: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
25. Nov. 2015
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Working remote does not seem to be a problem, as far as my experience goes. This, of course, makes it easier when there are unreasonable deadlines.

Kontras

Nobody will come right out and say so, but you will be expected to work on your vacation time and days off. This is because there is no way humanly possible to complete all of the assigned tasks and still take time off. You will be expected to have read company email that arrived in your inbox late Sunday night before you start work on Monday. If your company was acquired by CGI, expect your annual vacation time to be reduced, and some will also find their salary reduced. You will not have any opportunity to discuss these items, as "onboarding" is handled through a web site and declining appears to mean quitting your job. There will never be adequate scoping of upcoming jobs, because there will never be enough time to perform a thorough evaluation, and/or the requirements will be so vague that you will be guessing about what is needed.

Mehr Bewertungen zu CGI entdecken

5,0
1. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

work life balance was great

Kontras

Little ability to move up in career

1,0
16. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Kontras

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle