All talk no action - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei AnswerLab: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
12. Juni 2021
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Answerlab boasts many extremely bright and dedicated employees.

Kontras

Those same employees are squeezed for all they are worth. With the exception of the sales and executive team who make bank off of other people’s blood sweat and tears, everyone is overworked and consequently underpaid. The notion of a ‘unique culture’ is pushed all too often but aside from getting overpriced blankets to push political views on employees and empty talks about diversity, the culture is very much like being back in high school. Mediocre middle management runs the show with little skill, experience or clear vision. Promotions are given only to those this clique bestows such honors to, often leaving you scratching your head why as they are not typically awarded to those with a demonstrated performance history to warrant said promotions. More troubling is that those who are truly deserving are often times skipped over altogether. A new policy of no longer announcing employee departures is a concerted effort to mask retention loss at a visible scale. Expect a glaring turnover and loss of industry leaders with this questionable/arbitrary mode of selective advancement. There is a huge issue with the existing hiring process. Middle management continually extends job offers to those who are somehow previously associated with them in one form or another. Countless, genuinely worthy candidates who take the time and effort to submit resumes are either overlooked entirely or played around with if they are selected to partake in initial interviews. When employees refer eligible hires who are then ghosted or mistreated during the interview phase, you end up alienating suitable candidates and anyone who may have considered referring talent in the future. Expect to work absurd hours and not be compensated for it as your employment status of exempt is a devious loop hole to habitually have you working considerably more hours for the same 40 hour a week pay. Even though this is a service industry which necessitates some overtime work put in on occasion, 70 hour work weeks are the norm here which is NOT NORMAL by any stretch of the imagination. For researchers, a quick review of ScheduleIt will regularly reveal employees working at 500%, 800% or 1000% capacity! This will most certainly interfere with one’s work-life balance and additionally, will ultimately have a hugely deleterious impact on one’s physical health and overall wellbeing. If you do have the courage to raise the issue with a superior, be forewarned that it will be used against you moving forward. Buzzwords like GRATITUDE at all staff meetings sound nice but the implementation of this ideal is sorely lacking. As for ‘caretime,’ while likely well-intentioned in theory is most obviously a farce. Any attempt to genuinely be a part of driving solutions will be dismissed completely. It seems as though company wide process improvement is of zero importance if not initiated by middle or upper management themselves. Again, another head scratcher as such desires are only intended to positively serve the company in tackling areas where pain points have long existed. These are not arbitrary improvements but those which are critical to the long term success of the organization. Non-managers are the ones most closely affected by these procedural flaws so extending that opportunity for everyone to have a voice and enact change is not only the logical thing to do but it should be welcomed whole-heartedly.

avatar
Reaktion von AnswerLab
4y
Thank you for your review. Several of us worked together to reflect on it, and we felt a lot of sadness, it really sunk in for us that you’ve had a very unhappy experience. Your review prompted a process of going inward to consider how we could ensure nobody has such an experience again, and we’re grateful for that. Although you mention several areas, it sounds like the core of your frustration which many of these issues stem from relates to your experience of AnswerLab’s managers. One thing we wanted to point out is how much we’ve invested in manager development over the past year. We have implemented monthly management training programs, created a talent development framework for people managers, and invested in external training programs. All this is to help new managers of our growing company transition from being brilliant individual contributors as UX researchers, to help them fulfill their career growth aspirations as people managers. It can take time for these programs to shift culture but we are seeing and celebrating all the ways it’s already happening. We want to extend empathy and genuine regret for your experience, and also offer a balancing perspective. Some of your assessments are a bit categorical and don’t reflect the lived experience for most people at AnswerLab. Here are a few that we feel called to provide a clarifying response to: ScheduleIt percentages don’t reflect actual hours worked, and nobody works at the high percentages which sometimes appear on the tool. That’s because ScheduleIt is designed for hour-based scheduling but our team uses it instead to allocate full days, (which get recorded as 24 hours). We’ve provided instructions for researchers to turn off this feature because we don’t use it. Eventually we may switch to a resourcing tool that better reflects the way we want to use it. Many AnswerLabbers from all levels have shared their needs and feedback with leadership using the many pathways we provide. Many of us have contributed ideas for change, and the resulting conversations have started several new initiatives and changed procedures. For instance, many researchers and managers advocated for more flexibility and researcher involvement in scheduling research sessions, which we are very proud that we have now implemented. Also, many people felt it was important to honor AnswerLabbers’ transitions to new opportunities, and AnswerLab returned to acknowledging these via all company email. These are just a few examples. Our capacity model, which is our instrument that ensure we have enough researchers to staff incoming work, is something we are reviewing constantly. It’s complex during this time of incredibly fast growth, to get it right. Although we don’t always get it right, we are certainly focused on ensuring 40 hour work weeks are the norm. Inclusivity of all kinds (race, age, family status, sexual orientation, gender identity) is part of our company’s DNA and we believe especially today it’s important to take a public stand in support of a more just and equitable world. The past 18 months have been difficult for many of us, including everyone working hard to ensure AnswerLab remained a stable business supporting employees and their families. We are proud we were able to retain everyone, increase salaries and build unique pandemic benefits. We believe that our devotion to AnswerLabbers is what has contributed to our 93% retention rate even during this time of transition. We extend you and your loved ones well wishes.

Mehr Bewertungen zu AnswerLab entdecken

5,0
31. Aug. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great team, work enviroment and flexbility

Kontras

low pay, lack of promotion

2,0
31. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Note: I put my own ideas into an AI agent to remove personality and ensure anonymity. Despite broader organizational challenges, colleagues are a clear strength. There is a strong sense of camaraderie and a genuine willingness to collaborate, with teams often supporting one another through periods of uncertainty. Several remaining senior leaders from earlier phases of the company demonstrate an awareness of employee needs and are actively working to preserve elements of culture, work/life balance, and internal relationships. Transparency does exist within the organization, though it can depend on where and how information is accessed. The role offers the fundamentals many candidates seek—fully remote work, with varying degrees of schedule flexibility depending on position. Day-to-day management is generally supportive, with many managers fostering a collaborative environment and stepping in to help when needed.

Kontras

Multiple rounds of layoffs have had a lasting impact on morale and internal culture, with limited visible effort from leadership to address the fallout. The company’s direction appears heavily driven by investment priorities, resulting in frequent strategic shifts, overpromising, and significant pressure on sales and delivery teams to execute against evolving and often unrealistic expectations. Leadership decisions tend to favor alignment with board-level vision over employee stability, long-term growth, or organizational trust when those priorities are in tension. Operationally, overlapping decision-makers and unclear ownership create unnecessary complexity, slowing execution and making day-to-day work more difficult than it needs to be. While leadership promotes openness to challenge, in practice, differing perspectives are often dismissed—particularly when they conflict with existing assumptions or strategic narratives. There is also a strong tendency to introduce new tools, platforms, and processes as solutions, rather than critically reassessing core strategy or acknowledging when current approaches may not be effective. Major initiatives, such as rebranding efforts, appear to be based on optimistic assumptions about business impact, leading to significant resource investment in work that does not clearly drive revenue. Overall, this misalignment between strategy, execution, and measurable outcomes creates ongoing strain and uncertainty, which prospective employees should carefully consider.

3
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle