Good place to learn things if you are interested - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei ACKO General Insurance: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4,0
4. Dez. 2021
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

They use some of the latest tech. Some high quality leadership team

Kontras

Product team needs to get more mature

avatar
Reaktion von ACKO General Insurance
4y
Thank you for your appreciation! We have made a note of your feedback and will indeed work on it. -VS

Mehr Bewertungen zu ACKO General Insurance entdecken

2,0
5. Okt. 2022
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good learning opportunity if you are in the right team

Kontras

Learning saturates after a certain time, type of work is heavily dependent on the team you are in.

1
2,0
5. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Compensation is good, and the team is generally helpful and communicative. The organization operates with a strong sense of urgency, enabling quick development and deployment of features. It is very much a startup environment where execution speed is prioritized, though this can occasionally result in trade-offs related to code quality and maintainability.

Kontras

In my experience, the biggest issue was the leadership culture. I often felt that empathy was lacking, and interactions from senior leadership could come across as dismissive, overly critical, and focused on fault-finding rather than support or coaching. Recognition for good work was rare, while mistakes received significant attention. Job security was another major concern. Frequent reorganizations created a constant sense of uncertainty. During one restructuring, I, multiple members of my team, my manager, and my director were all laid off on the same day with very little explanation. The experience felt abrupt and impersonal. The teams that he(VP of d2c eng) personally got involved with got relatively much lesser layoffs and others more, showing clear politics in play and favouritism. The environment could be highly micromanaged at times, with a strong emphasis on scrutiny and oversight. It often felt like employees were being continuously evaluated rather than trusted to do their jobs. This made it difficult to take ownership or feel comfortable experimenting and learning from mistakes. I also felt that visibility within the organization mattered more than it should. There were times when decisions appeared inconsistent across teams, which led to perceptions of favoritism and office politics. Whether intentional or not, this affected trust in leadership. Overall, the company moves fast and gets things done, but the combination of limited job security, frequent restructuring, heavy oversight, and a lack of appreciation made it a difficult place for me to see a long-term future.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle