Cover image for Meta
Alle Fotos anzeigen


Aktiver Arbeitgeber


Bewertung posten

Bewertungen für Meta

73% Würden einem Freund empfehlen
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg
57% Befürworten Geschäftsführer
Würden einem Freund empfehlen
Befürworten Geschäftsführer
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg
4 947 Bewertungen
Bestätigen Sie Ihre E-Mail-Adresse, um zu filtern. Gibt es Probleme? E-Mail erneut senden

12 086 von über 16 474 Bewertungen gefunden

Aktualisiert am 2. Okt. 2023

    1. 5,0
      17. März 2014
      Software Development Engineer
      Ehem. Mitarbeiter, mehr als 1 Jahr
      Seattle, WA
      Positive CEO-Bewertung


      It might be easy to roll your eyes when people from Facebook say how open their culture is, but it's true; it's more open than any other place I've worked at. At a company wide-level, secret projects, public incidents, important non-public business metrics and the like are all openly discussed. You can ask questions about them directly to Zuckerburg at the weekly Q&A. I think the idea is that if everyone is on the same page or at least, differing views are heard, the company will be stronger, and solutions may be offered from a place you didn't expect. This is much different from previous companies I worked at, where discussions on internal email lists would be shut down by some lawyer saying that there's certain things that can't be discussed, and important data is divided up to groups and individuals on a "need to know" basis, etc. This culture applies at a lower level too. You feel comfortable giving feedback to each other about each other, about product decisions, about management, etc. The flipside of this openness is that you of course, have to be willing to receive the feedback, you have to recognize that while openness and feedback is highly encouraged, decisions have to get made, and actions and data are more valuable than words. At the higher level, since the company trusts employees with access to so much information, keeping such info confidential from the outside world is taken seriously. It's a great place to work as an engineer. You're given a lot of freedom, but it's also a responsibility to make sure you're doing things that are valuable. You don't get much credit for working hard or being smart if you don't produce valuable output. One cool thing about Facebook, in contrast to other comparable companies (Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, though in truth, FB is much smaller), is how they have a pretty singular focus. Even with the differing areas (including advertising and such), they do a good job of keeping their eye on their mission of connecting as many people as possible. I also think they are way more empathetic to their users than most people give them credit for. It seems like popular opinion has it that FB is arrogant and only cares about its users insomuch as they represent $-signs. From within the company, it didn't feel this way at all. I saw a lot of empathy towards users, and a lot effort spent to improve or things or fix broken things with no direct financial benefit. The strategy is not complex. The thinking is that if they can make FB easier and more fun to use, then more people will use it for more time each day (which will also have a network effect of attracting even more people to use it), then the advertising dollars will follow. Of course, it is true that FB wants to make the audience more accessible to advertisers as well, but there are a lot of people at FB who care about privacy and security. They have really good infrastructure and really great ways to share the infrastructure and code. They have a lot of cool internal tools, and what they've built is really impressive, and more importantly, it helps your team build products faster without having to solve problems that someone else already solved. Every software company tries to do this, but FB seems to have been more successful with it. Perhaps it's because they're still relatively small, but if anything, I can at least say it is very cool while it lasts. The perks and work environment are great, unless you're one of those types that can't stand open office spaces. I've worked in both a private office and open offices in multiple companies. While I do think a private office has some benefits, I mostly think it's a personal luxury for the employee and a huge waste of money for the company. I'd much rather have the money go into other areas like salary, benefits, and other workplace improvements rather than the added real estate necessary to have offices. Of course, you've heard about the food and snacks. They have an amazing selection of great stuff, and what I like about it is that it sort of goes above and beyond expectations. Sure, some days, lunch is better than others, but I really can't complain, and the selection of drinks and snacks is amazing. It's not like you should work at FB just because of that, but it demonstrates FB's desire to make work as fun and convenient as possible. You'll be surrounded by people who like being there. I can't think of a better environment to work in. If you have a giant ego, you may not like it as much. Respect is definitely given to those that have deep experience in the industry, and they are expected to lead others and mentor more junior employees. However, if for whatever reason, you can't perform at the level expected, no one is going to care if you did this and that at Google or shipped ten things at MS, etc. FB also has a lot of fun events, and I made a lot of friends working there, so going to the events was fun. Also, if you're older and worried that FB is just a bunch of 22-year-olds, and that you won't fit in, I wouldn't worry about that. FB does have a lot of young employees (who are really smart btw), and it does hire a lot of people straight out of college, but it also attracts a lot of experienced engineers from other top companies like Google, MS, Amazon, etc. Work-life-balance seemed totally normal to me. It may be different depending on your team, but I felt you could do 40-50 hours of work a week for the most part and you would be totally fine. It's about what you produce, not how hard you're working. Other team members who had children would work normal hours and go home at normal times. I didn't see any of these folks have a problem when they left early to take care of their child or things like that. Of course, there could be times that people are expected to work extra if something critical happens, but for the most part everyone wants to avoid this and this happens sparingly, from what I observed. Now, there were many times where I chose to work late myself, but I never felt any pressure to do so. The caveat is that there are on-call rotations, and in addition, even if you are not on-call, you are expected to be reasonably available if the on-call person needs your help. However, again, no one wants this, and your team will work on ways to avoid these situations. The best thing I can say is that working at FB is about productivity. I didn't experience and political bs and it was a pleasure working with a group of people who were all concerned with producing a good product and making the best of the time spent while doing it.


      FB expects a lot out of engineers, and you can't slack off. Of course, you shouldn't slack off at any job, but since FB is pretty fast-paced, there is a risk that you'll have trouble adjusting at first. FB has a lot of custom infrastructure and tools, and prehaps more impressively, it works great. It makes doing your job really great, but on the other hand, you'll end up learning a lot of stuff that won't be applicable elsewhere. FB's code-base is very good in some ways, but in other ways, it's not as great as some of the existing engineers think it is. I don't think this is that big of a deal, but the important part is that as an engineer, you need to quickly learn FB's values and practices and "get with the program" so to speak. If you don't like some things, then you just have to deal with it, as it's not likely you're going to change people's minds at this point. The nice thing is that things are at least very consistent.


      Thanks for your great feedback. We really appreciate the transparency from Mark, Sheryl, and the entire leadership team. This open culture does permeate throughout the company, and we are focused on maintaining it as we grow. Even as we have grown, our commitment to our values (be bold, move fast, be open, etc.) has helped us stay true to our culture, and we plan to maintain that commitment as we grow. --Your friends at Facebook

      1. 5,0
        16. Feb. 2017
        Anonymer Mitarbeiter
        Akt. Mitarbeiter, mehr als 1 Jahr
        Menlo Park, CA
        Positive CEO-Bewertung


        - Unglaubliche Vorteile - Hervorragende Vergütung, die starke Leistung belohnt - Viel Autonomie - Tonnenweise Raum für Wachstum - Sehr transparent von oben nach unten - Starke Führung - Intelligente und fürsorgliche Kollegen - Der fairste und durchdachteste Überprüfungsprozess, den Sie überall finden - Spannende Arbeit


        - Wenn Sie nicht lernen, die Work-Life-Balance für Sie zu gestalten, kann dies anstrengend sein. Aber Sie werden auch viel Unterstützung dabei erhalten, wenn Sie danach fragen. - Es spielt keine Rolle, wie gut Sie in Ihrem Job sind, es besteht die Möglichkeit, dass Sie von einer Menge anderer Menschen umgeben sind, die genauso gut, wenn nicht sogar besser sind. Das Imposter-Syndrom ist real, aber wenn Sie ein Angebot haben, gehören Sie wahrscheinlich auch hierher.

        Übersetzt aus dem Englischen

        Thank you for the feedback. From the Life@ benefits and conveniences to the many employee affinity and advice groups, we are all here to support you. If you need additional help, please reach out to your HR Business Partner.

      2. Werden Sie Teil des Teams von Meta
        Neueste Jobs anzeigen
      1 - 10 von 12 086 Bewertungen angezeigt

      Häufig gestellte Fragen zu Meta Bewertungen

      Meta wurde insgesamt mit 3,9 von 5 Sternen bewertet, basierend auf über 16 474 Bewertungen, die Beschäftigte anonym abgegeben haben. 73 % der Beschäftigten würden Meta als Arbeitgeber einem Freund oder einer Freundin empfehlen und 50 % sehen die Zukunft des Unternehmens positiv. Diese Bewertung ist in den letzten 12 Monaten um -6 % gesunken.

      Ausgehend von den anonym auf Glassdoor abgegebenen Bewertungen erhält Meta von seinen Beschäftigten bei der Vergütung und den Zusatzleistungen 4,6 von 5 Sternen. Holen Sie sich weitere Informationen zu den Gehältern und Zusatzleistungen bei Meta. Diese Bewertung ist in den letzten 12 Monaten stabil geblieben.

      73 % der bei Meta Beschäftigten würden das Unternehmen einem Freund oder einer Freundin als Arbeitgeber weiterempfehlen. Grundlage sind die Glassdoor-Bewertungen. Beschäftigte bewerteten Meta mit 3,6 von 5 Sternen bei der Work-Life-Balance, mit 3,7 für die Kultur und Werte und mit 3,9 für die Karrierechancen.

      Beliebte Karrieren für die, die eine Stelle bei Meta suchen


      Auf Glassdoor finden Sie 16 474 Bewertungen zu Meta, anonym von bei Meta Beschäftigten gepostet. Lesen Sie die Mitarbeiterbewertungen auf Glassdoor, um zu entscheiden, ob Meta für Sie das richtige Unternehmen ist.