Race to the bottom - Scientist bei Merck: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
1. März 2011
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Flexible work schedule Still a lot of highly talented scientists

Kontras

Upper management no longer treats its employees with dignity; it treats them like a commodity. No investment in employees' skills--the first thing they cut when profits slide is the training budget. No opportunity for advancement unless you have the right connections. Workload is incredibly high and the scientific staff is stretched to the breaking point.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Merck entdecken

5,0
3. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

End of the year shutdown which includes paid time off

Kontras

The con for me at the time was that I had to relocate which wasn’t possible

4,0
2. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Over my tenure, I had the opportunity to work alongside highly talented and mission-driven colleagues dedicated to improving patient outcomes. The organization provided exposure to cross-functional collaboration, leadership development opportunities, and meaningful work supporting healthcare providers, patients, and community stakeholders. I appreciated the company's commitment to innovation, professional growth, and serving patients through scientific advancement.

Kontras

Like many large organizations, priorities and organizational structures evolved over time, which occasionally created uncertainty and changes in responsibilities. Decision-making processes could sometimes be complex due to the size of the organization, and navigating multiple layers of stakeholders occasionally impacted speed and execution.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle